ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of our study is to investigate the management of colorectal cancer patients during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has affected our daily routine. We aimed to compare our results between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, and evaluate any seasonal differences within the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study was conducted in a single center. We included all participants who had elective and emergency gastrointestinal operations due to colorectal cancer between March 2019 and March 2021. Participant data were separated and compared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, with the latter divided into two groups (Group 1: Phase 1-2, Group 2: Phase 3). Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the cases treated before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period in terms of mean age, gender distribution, diagnosis, tumor location, American Society of Anesthetists (ASA) score, recurrence, or mortality (p>0.05). We found no differences between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods in admission to the hospital, surgical approach, need for stoma, complications, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), total hospitalization, or tumor stage (p>0.05). However, we observed that the percentage of open surgical operations was statistically significantly higher, and the percentage of laparoscopic surgical operations was statistically significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p=0.020). Conclusion: The pandemic periods should not be assessed with the same perspective. Treatment approaches can change according to hospital capacity during peak periods of COVID-19 disease.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: With two cycles of virtual residency interviews, we evaluated applicants' perceptions and behavior. Method(s): All 2021 and 2022 general surgery interviewees at our institution were surveyed. Analyses were conducted using chi-square and t-tests. Result(s): Cumulatively, 134 of 238 interviewees responded (56.3%). Respondents were 50.3% male, 83% white, and 27.2 years old (SD 2.9). Candidates applied to more programs due to interviews being virtual (61%), but this effect decreased in 2022 (38%, p=0.2). Similarly, they endorsed accepting more interviews (54% in 2021 and 45% in 2022, p=0.6) with a median of 17 interviews in 2021 and 15 in 2022 (p=0.18). 27.6% reported expanding their geographic reach. The advantages were consistently saving money (96%), saving time (50%), and avoiding COVID-19 (44%). Top limitations were the inability to observe interpersonal interactions (61.2%), increased difficulty comparing programs (58.2%) and less exposure to current residents and faculty (57.4%). In the 2022 cycle, 84.7% of candidates felt the common supplemental application was not worth their time because it did not improve their application. 95% of respondents 'signaled' their top five programs, from which 20% received no interview offers and only 3% received offers from all. Conclusion(s): Virtual interviews led applicants to expand their geographic range and increase the number of programs to which they applied;however, 2022 saw a dampening of this effect. Perceived limitations did not improve in 2022, and the supplemental application was not valued by applicants. The benefits of virtual interviews must be balanced against the intangible ability to observe program culture.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Increasing evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of universal masking precautions in reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Whether these precautions have an impact on surgical site infections (SSI), currently remains unknown. This study assesses whether implementation of universal masking precautions altered the rates of SSI. Method(s): We performed a single-institution, retrospective cohort study using the NSQIP database, evaluating all patients undergoing most performed general surgery procedures from June 2018 to December 2021. SSI rates were compared between patients who underwent operation before and after implementation of universal masking precautions at our institution in March 2020. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test. Result(s): A total of 1,539 patients were included;721 patients were in the pre-masking cohort, while 818 in post-masking cohort. During this time period, a total of 143 (9.3%) patients developed SSI, 3.6% incisional and 5.7% deep organ space infections (OSI) (p=0.6601). Incisional and OSI rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (incisional 3.47% vs 3.67%, p=0.891;OSI 5.41% vs 5.99%, p=0.6608). Sub-analysis of top 5 procedures (by volume - laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, thromboendarterectomy, colectomy with anastomosis, and colectomy with ileocolostomy) demonstrated a significant decrease in incisional infections (3.7% vs 1.62%, p=0.0354). Conclusion(s): While the incidence of SSI did not differ significantly in the overall cohort after implementation of universal masking precautions, there was a decrease in incisional infections in commonly performed procedures at our institution. Future research is needed to identify whether continued masking precautions may minimize the risk of SSI in specific patient populations.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The effects of COVID-19 on surgical practice are extensive and include modifications to perioperative practice and ways of working, workforce and staffing difficulties, procedural prioritization, intraoperative viral transmission risk, and surgical training and education. There is a lack of information about the way this pandemic has impacted medical professionals because of surgical practice. Aims and Objectives: The current study's goal was to determine the dispersion of COVID 19 through patients to healthcare professionals utilising PPE during emergency surgeries. Material(s) and Method(s): The study was conducted as a hospital based retro prospective observational study at the Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College and hospital of central India. After receiving institutional ethical committee permission and the informed written consent, 36 patients receiving emergency surgeries during COVID-19 Era and 109 health care professionals involved in patient care were evaluated for the onset of any COVID 19 symptom for 5 days postoperatively. All the data collected were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 26. Result(s): Among these 36 emergency surgeries patients, 86.1% (n=31) had COVID positive report during admission, mostly had complain of respiratory symptoms. Out of 16 COVID positive health workers, 81.25% (n=13) suffered from respiratory symptoms, 43.75% (n=7) had G.I symptoms and 12.50% (n=2) were asymptomatic. Analysis showed a positive relation between COVID positive status and depression in health care professionals (p=0.028). Out of 93 COVID negative health care workers involved in emergency surgeries, 90.32 % (n=84) were asymptomatic. Only 9.67% (n=9) health care workers had respiratory symptoms and 2.1% (n=2) had gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusion(s): The current study may aid in the development of mitigation measures to enhance mental well-being, as well as the identification of factors of poor mental state and therapies to treat people suffering from a mental condition. Postoperative assessments in a digital environment on an individual basis allow team members to voice their worries and comments to the system as a mitigating technique. Evidence-based training and education for HCWs on pandemic preparation has been shown to be critical for improving hospital staff expertise, abilities, and mental well-being during a pandemic.Copyright © 2023, Dr. Yashwant Research Labs Pvt. Ltd.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: After COVID-19, telehealth (TH) capabilities expanded relaying patient satisfaction, time savings, and efficient access to care. We hypothesize standardized TH scheduling processes improves TH utilization without increasing adverse events (AE). Method(s): The Telehealth Utilization Quality Improvement Initiative was conducted from 8/2021-1/2022 in the general surgery clinic. 50 visits pre-implementation and 70 visits post-implementation were audited over the study period. Stakeholders were engaged including faculty, clinic coordinators, and administrative staff to identify current workflows and potential interventions, targeting outpatient elective procedures. Process mapping outlined current TH scheduling workflows. Outcomes such as percent TH scheduled in clinic, in addition to cost, and adverse patient events were collected post-implementation. Result(s): Preliminary data revealed 50 patients who underwent elective outpatient surgeries, all appropriate for TH postoperative follow-up visits. Overall, the pre-implementation TH scheduling rate was 32%. TH was schedule dafter surgery in the preintervention group. The intervention required TH postoperative appointments to be scheduled in clinic at the time of surgery scheduling with TH being the default postsurgical appointment for a standardized list of eligible procedures. After implementation, 95% of patients undergoing elective, outpatient general surgery procedures were scheduled for a TH visit with 83% of patients completing their follow up via TH.This resulted in increased revenue of $30,431 in billable visits due to increased clinic visit availability. No AE were seen. Conclusion(s): Standardizing TH scheduling based on procedure improves the utilization of TH in outpatient, elective general surgery procedures resulting in improved clinic efficiency, increased revenue, and no AE.
ABSTRACT
The Coronavirus pandemic has caused major change across the world and in the National Health Service. In order to cope and help limit contagion, numerous institutions recognised the need to adjust clinical practice quickly yet safely. In this paper, we aim to describe the changes implemented in a general surgery department at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. Across the surgical specialties, frameworks, protocols and guidelines have been established locally and nationally. The aerosol generating procedures involved in general surgery required us to alter our daily activities. Modifications to patient management were necessary to try and reduce viral spread. Staff wellbeing was heavily promoted in order to help maintain the frontline workforce. A holistic approach was required.
ABSTRACT
Aim: While recent evidence describes atypical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in elderly patients, the frequency of delirium and associated outcomes in elderly patients with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection undergoing emergency surgery are not well defined. This study aims to determine the effect of COVID-19 on postoperative delirium and postoperative death in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Material(s) and Method(s): This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in general surgery, orthopedics, and cardiovascular surgery clinics of a public hospital, including 30 days of follow-up between April 1 and May 1, 2021. All patients who were admitted to these clinics for emergency surgery intervention on these dates constituted the study population, while a total of 140 patients aged >=65 years, who met the study criteria, formed the sample of the study. Descriptive Characteristics Form and Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) were used as data collection tools in the study. SPSS 25.0 statistical program was used for data analysis. Result(s): Thirty (42.85%) of the SARS-CoV-2 positive (n=70) patients developed delirium in the study. 12.9% (n=18) of the patients died within 30 days of follow-up after surgery. There were 30 (69.8) of 70 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients who developed delirium, and 12 patients (25.5) died after testing positive for COVID-19, with a mean of 8.08T1.56 days within 30 days of admission. Discussion(s): These findings may lead to a poor clinical prognosis for COVID-19 infection delirium and postoperative death in patients over 65 years of age undergoing emergency surgery.Copyright © 2023, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: A decrease in operative volume of general surgery chiefs graduating the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) was previously noted using self-reported Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs. The purpose of this study is to examine if this trend was captured in self-reported case logs and if those trends were similarly captured in an automated multi-institution artificial intelligence-based case log. Method(s): The ACGME National Data Report of general surgery cases was queried for mean cases performed as surgeon chief for the pre-pandemic (2018-2019) and pandemic (2019-2020 and 2020- 2021) period. A 24-institute HIPAA-compliant, web-based, surgical education management platform using an embedded artificial intelligence algorithm to generate case logs from electronic operative schedules was also queried. Percent change was calculated and statistical significance was calculated with unpaired T-Test. Result(s): Fifty-three ACGME categories were reviewed. A significant (p<0.05) decrease occurred in 19 categories (35.8%) the first pandemic year compared with pre-pandemic. The second pandemic year (2020-2021) 10 categories (18.8%) had a significant increase (p<0.05). The automated case log system did not see the same trend with only 2.7% of categories (9/324) with a significant decrease the first pandemic year. No subsequent significant increases occurred the second pandemic year. Conclusion(s): ACGME case logs reveal a recovery of operative volume for general surgery chiefs during the second year of the pandemic. However, the 24-institution, automatically logged system did not see the same trend. Regional variation or improved accuracy of automated case logs may explain the discrepancy.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Due to the COVID 19 pandemic healthcare providers all over the world had brought some changes in the management of surgical patients. This study is aimed to estimate the impact of pandemic on surgical practices. Material(s) and Method(s): We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients admitted to the department of general surgery (both elective & emergency), SCB Medical College and Hospital, Odisha, India from April 1 to July 31, 2020, and 2021 and the records were those of patients who were admitted in the same period in 2019. Data collection includes the number of admissions, the reason for admission, the age & gender of the patients admitted patients and type of management. Result(s): There was a 57.5% reduction in total admission during first COVID in pandemic 2020 and 58.7% reduction during second wave of pandemic in 2021. The proportion of patient presenting to emergency department was more in 2020 and 2021 than 2019. Number of emergency admission decreased by 46.54% in 2020 and 46% in 2021. There was a 79.5% drop in the number of out-patients admission in 2020 and 84% in 2021. Furthermore a 79.8% reduction in elective surgical intervention noticed in 2020 and 80% in 2021. Conservative management was preferred over surgical management during the COVID era. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 has led to a drastic reduction in outpatient and elective surgical practices. Hence creating a major concern for all surgeons about the critical situation.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread effects on the healthcare system. For trainees, one particular detriment has been the cancellation of elective operations, reducing clinical experience and procedural volumes. Measures instituted to combat the pandemic have resulted in decreased cancellation of elective cases to varying degrees. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ongoing effect of the pandemic on resident operative volume. Method(s): Operative case numbers of general surgical graduates in 2019, 2020, and 2021 were extracted from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs. Data included mean total cases/graduate and means for individual case types. Data was considered by overall number of cases and cases performed as surgeon chief. Analysis of variance was employed to compare groups with p<0.05 considered significant. Result(s): Mean total major cases differed significantly among groups with reduced volume noted for 2020 graduates but no difference in volume between 2019 and 2021 graduates (1070.5+/-150 vs 1054.8+/-155 vs 1074.1+/-164, p=0.0041). This same pattern was noted for surgeon chief total cases (288.6+/-69 vs 264.4+/-67 vs 286.2+/-73, p<0.0001) as well as several major general surgery subcategories including cases involving the stomach, small intestine, large intestine, biliary system, among others. Conclusion(s): Despite continued reduction in and alteration of elective surgery practice, improved pandemic measures have allowed for increased surgical volume. This has translated to increased operative experience for graduating surgical trainees that are comparable to case numbers that preceded the pandemic. Ramifications for the 2020 graduating cohort as well subsequent cohorts require continued evaluation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Virtual interviews (VIs) for the 2020 residency application season were mandated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to determine the perspectives of general surgery (GS) program directors (PDs) on the benefits and drawbacks of VIs. METHODS: A 14-item survey was emailed to all GS PDs from programs identified on the American Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Program directors were asked about the cost-time benefit of VIs, its ability to assess candidates, and their thoughts on the future of VIs for evaluating residency applicants. RESULTS: 60 PDs responded corresponding to a response rate of 21%. While 93% agreed/strongly agreed that VIs were less expensive, only 35% found VIs to be less time-consuming. 75% and 67%, respectively, disagreed/strongly disagreed that VIs allowed for an easier assessment of an applicant's fit, and personality and communication skills. Almost one-half of our survey respondents suggested that VIs made the selection committee rely more heavily on objective applicant data. Almost two-thirds of GS PDs suggested that they would adopt both VI and in-person interview formats for future application cycles. The median [interquartile range] cost saved through the implementation of VIs was US$ 4500 [1625 - 10 000]. CONCLUSION: Remarkably, VIs have been swiftly imbibed by all residency programs and many aspects of the VI experience were positive. While MATCH 2021 has definitely proved to be one of its kind, the implementation of VIs has been met with overall broad success and a promising future awaits this novel modality of resident selection to GME programs in the United States.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To describe the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency general surgery operative volumes during governmental shutdowns secondary to the pandemic and characterize differences in disease severity, morbidity, and mortality during this time compared to previous years. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compares patients who underwent emergency general surgery operations at a tertiary hospital from March 1st to May 31st of 2020 to 2019. Average emergent cases per day were analyzed, comparing identical date ranges between 2020 (pandemic group) and 2019 (control group). Secondary analysis was performed analyzing disease severity, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: From March 1st to May 31st, 2020, 2.5 emergency general surgery operations were performed on average daily compared to 3.0 operations on average daily in 2019, a significant decrease (P = .03). No significant difference was found in presenting disease severity, morbidity, or mortality between the pandemic and control groups. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates a decrease of 65% in emergency general surgery operations during governmental restrictions secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. This decrease in operations was not associated with worse disease severity, morbidity, or mortality.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an exclusively virtual 2021 residency application cycle. We hypothesized that residency programs' online presence would have increased utility and influence for applicants. METHODS: Substantial surgery residency website modifications were undertaken in the summer of 2020. Page views were gathered by our institution's information technology office for comparison across years and programs. An anonymous, voluntary, online survey was sent to all interviewed applicants for our 2021 general surgery program match. Five-point Likert-scale questions evaluated applicants' perspective on the online experience. RESULTS: Our residency website received 10,650 page views in 2019 and 12,688 in 2020 (P = 0.14). Page views increased with a greater margin compared to a different specialty residency program's (P < 0.01). From 108 interviewees, 75 completed the survey (69.4%). Respondents indicated our website was satisfactory or very satisfactory compared to other programs (83.9%), and none found it unsatisfactory. Applicants overall stated our institution's online presence impacted their decision to interview (51.6%). Programs' online presence impacted the decision to interview for nonWhite applicants (68%) but significantly less for white applicants (31%, P < 0.03). We observed a trend that those with fewer than this cohort's median interviews (17 or less) put more weight on online presence (65%), compared to those with 18 or greater interviews (35%). CONCLUSIONS: Applicants utilized program websites more during the 2021 virtual application cycle; our data show most applicants depend on institutions' websites to supplement their decision-making; however, there are subgroup differences in the influence online presence has on applicant decisions. Efforts to enhance residency webpages and online resources for candidates may positively influence prospective surgical trainees, and especially those underrepresented in medicine, to decide to interview.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Humans , Prospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Introduction: The increased number of surgery on the elderly is often followed by an increased risk of mortality rate. Identifying the risk factors of surgical death in elderly patients will be mandatory before making a decision. This study aimed to determine mortality-associated factors in older people who underwent inpatient elective surgery. Methods: This cohort retrospective study analyzed secondary data from the medical records of geriatric patients hospitalized at Dr. Kariadi Hospital Semarang in 2020. Patients aged ≥ 60 years and who have undergone elective surgery were included. Patients with incomplete medical records, who had undergone outpatient surgery, more than one surgery, and emergency surgery, Covid-19, were excluded. A total of 382 patients met the criteria. In this study, independent variables analyzed were age, sex, nutritional status based on body mass index, functional status by Barthel, marital status, residence status, number of comorbidities according to Charlson Comorbidity Index, albumin levels, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, surgery type, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. The dependent variable was in-hospital mortality. In the logistic regression analysis, we identified the five most significant variables to allow for the prediction of in-hospital mortality. Results: Residence status (p= 0.003), ECG (p= 0.001), comorbidity (p <0.0001), albumin status (p< 0.0001), and ASA status (p< 0.0001) were identified as factors that affect postoperative mortality after multivariate analysis. Conclusion: In this study, mortality-associated factors were living alone, ECG abnormality, comorbidity > 2, hypoalbumin, and ASA > 2. © 2023, Sanglah General Hospital. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of the study is to reveal the most common general surgery problems during the pandemic period in our center, where all departments only deal with COVID-19 patients. Methods: In our study, general surgery consultations made between 1st November 2020 and 1st February 2021, when our center only served pandemic patients, were retrospectively examined. Demographic data of the patients, distribution of the departments where consultation was requested, reasons for consultation, pathology detection rate, treatment modalities, mortality rates and surgical procedures were included. Results: A total of 70 patients, 33 female, and 37 male, were included in this study. The most common problems of the patients were gastrointestinal system (GIS) problems (46/70, 65.7%). The second most common problem was hepatopancreaticobiliary problems (12/70, 17.1%). This was followed by soft tissue disorders, hernia problems, and trauma cases, respectively. These were mostly treated medically, but surgical treatment was sometimes required (77.1% vs 22.9%). Conclusions: As reported in the literature, the most common surgical pathologies in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 are usually related to the GIS. These pathologies can mostly be treated medically (73.9%). However, surgical treatment was more rarely required (26.1%). The highest rate of surgical treatment was for hernia patients (100%). In general, medical treatment was successful. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of European Research Journal is the property of Prusa Medical Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: la pandemia por la Covid-19 modificó la educación médica con estrategias apoyadas en plataformas virtuales y en escenarios no convencionales. Un ejemplo de ello son las reuniones de morbilidad y mortalidad (M y M). El objetivo de este estudio es describir las características de las M y M virtuales en las instituciones de práctica de los residentes de cirugía general en Colombia; así como la percepción de los participantes sobre su funcionamiento, comparado con las M y M presenciales o tradicionales. Método: estudio observacional y descriptivo realizado en 21 instituciones hospitalarias de práctica, de 17 programas de cirugía general de Colombia en donde operan M y M virtuales. Se obtuvo información sobre sus objetivos, características operativas y alcances. Con encuestas autodiligenciadas se investigó, además, la percepción de los participantes acerca de su utilidad y funcionamiento, producto del cambio a la virtualidad. Participaron 82 residentes y 65 docentes de diferentes programas de posgrado de cirugía general del país. Resultados: las M y M virtuales se ejecutan en el 53 % de los sitios de práctica de los residentes de Colombia, con el predominio en las instituciones privadas. Si bien hay diferencias en su organización, persiste el modelo tradicional de M y M: objetivos, estructura y alcances. Hay una duración mayor de las reuniones, se realizan en horarios no convencionales, con una percepción de un menor nivel académico. Se respira un menor ambiente de hostilidad con el uso de la virtualidad. Conclusión: las reuniones de morbilidad y mortalidad se realizan en un escenario de virtualidad. Su funcionamiento es similar a las reuniones presenciales y su ejecución ofrece oportunidades de mejora en términos de forma y fondo.
Summary Introduction: The Covid-19 pandemic changed medical education, with strategies supported by virtual platforms and non-conventional scenarios. An example of this is the morbidity and mortality meetings (M&M). The objective of this study is to find the characteristics of virtual M&M meetings in different institutions focused on general surgery resident´s students in Colombia, and how medical residents and professors feel about them compared to the traditional face-to-face meetings. Methodology: This is an observational, and descriptive study in 21 hospital practice institutions of 17 General Surgery programs in Colombia, where virtual M&M operate. Information was obtained on their objectives, operational characteristics and scope. Additionally, in self-completion surveys, the participants' perception about the usefulness and operation was investigated, this, because of the shift to virtuality. There was participation of 82 residents and 65 professors from different postgraduate programs in General Surgery in the country. Results: Virtual M&Ms continue in 53 % of the practice sites, with a predominance in private institutions. There are differences in their organization, although the traditional M&M model persists: objectives, structure, and scope. There is a longer duration of meetings, unconventional schedules and the perception of a reduced academic level. There is an improvement in the hostile environment, within the virtuality. Conclusion: M&Ms have a place in a virtual scenario. Its operation is like face-to-face meetings, and its execution offers opportunities for improvement in terms of form and content.
ABSTRACT
Mandibular arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare lesions which can present with life-threatening haemorrhage. Endovascular embolisation can be life saving for these patients. We discuss a patient of mandibular AVM, who initially presented with reports of massive oral bleeding. The lesion was only partially embolised via transarterial route, as the nidus could not be penetrated completely. In view of rebleeding within 72 hours from the same site, a second embolisation procedure was done via combined, transarterial and transvenous approaches. Coils and onyx were used as embolising agents. Complete embolisation was achieved via combined approach. No further bleeding episodes were seen at 1-year follow-up. Endovascular embolisation of mandibular AVMs can be technically challenging and, hence, a sound knowledge of the anatomy as well as the possible modification of technique is essential to achieve complete obliteration of the lesion and to maximise the benefit of embolisation and to avoid major radical surgery.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations , Humans , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Mandible/pathology , Oral Hemorrhage , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In order to improve the cure rate of critically ill patients in Wuhan epidemic area and reduce the fatality rate, the state have dispatched medical staffs from the whole country to support Wuhan and treat critically ill patients in dedicated facilities. A medical team from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, consisting of 133 medical staffs major in critical care medicine, respiralogy, infection, cardiology, and general surgery, entirely took over the critical care unit of the East Hospital of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, and formed a multidisciplinary collaboration team with local medical staffs to treat patients together. Up to March 13th in 2020, the author's medical team has admitted a total of 109 patients, of which 48 had been discharged up on recovery. Critically ill patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 mainly have elder age, comorbidities, complicated conditions, and difficult diagnosis and treatment. The author and the author's team combined with clinical practice, share experience and strategies of general surgery related issues in the treatment of critically ill patients, providing reference for collegues in general surgery.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of outpatient screening in department of general surgery during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Method(s): The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 57 patients who visited surgery clinic and emergency department of Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between February 1st and 26th in 2020 were collected. There were 30 males and 27 females, aged (53+/-16)years, with a range from 17 to 87 years. All the 57 patients were measured score of outpatient screening in department of general surgery. The score >=3 indicated high risk and the score < 3 indicated low risk. Observation indicators: (1) clinical data of patients;(2) score of outpatient screening for COVID-19 of patients. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean+/-SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed by the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (IQR), and comparison between groups was analyzed by the rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Result(s): (1) Clinical data of patients: of the 57 patients, there were 12 males and 14 females of the 26 confirmed or suspected cases, versus 18 males and 13 females of the 31 non-infection cases, showing no significant difference between the two groups (chi2=0.805, P>0.05). The 26 confirmed or suspected cases of COVID-19 had an age of (57+/-16)years, and 31 non-infection cases had an age of (50+/-16) years, with no significant difference between the two groups (t=-1.646, P>0.05). (2) Score of outpatient screening for COVID-19 of patients: the score of outpatient screening for COVID-19 of the 26 confirmed or suspected cases was 3.0(4.0), versus 1.0(1.0) of the 31 non-infection cases, showing a significant difference between the two groups (Z=-3.695, P<0.05). There were 17 and 9 of the 26 confirmed or suspected cases with high risks and low risks, respectively, versus 3 and 28 of the 31 non-infection cases, with a significant difference between the two groups (chi2=19.266, P<0.05). Conclusion(s): During the COVID-19 outbreak, outpatient screening in department of general surgery can effectively screen out high-risk patients.Copyright © 2020 by the Chinese Medical Association.